TOP NAV
BOOK
BLOGS 15
BLOGS 14
BLOGS 13
BLOGS 12
BLOGS 11
BLOGS 10
BLOGS 09
BLOGS 08
BLOGS 07
BLOGS 06
BLOGS 05
BLOGS 04
| Letter to a Liberal | The Left Returns to Sacrifice |
by Christopher Chantrill
January 11, 2004 at 3:00 am
IF YOU STOP your tour bus by a rice paddy in China, you will soon be surrounded by people. But if you stop your rental car along a county road in Iowa, you will see no-one. The countryside in the U.S. is deserted, for everyone has gone to live in the city.
The peoples of the Earth are living through the climactic stage of a Great Transformation. It is, perhaps, the greatest transformation that humans have ever experienced. Five hundred years ago, almost everyone lived on the land and grew their own food. A hundred years from now, almost nobody will.
The British moved to the city throughout the nineteenth century, and the North Americans in the second half. The Germans moved in a rush at the end of the nineteenth century, and the French moved after World War II. But now the transformation has reached the great watered plains of Asia. The Han people are moving to the city in their hundreds of millions, and the South Asians are not far behind.
The southern border of the United States is engaged in this transformation, for it lies on the migration route of Mexicans who are moving from the country to the city.
Why are they migrating? The reason is surprising. When Johan Norberg asked a Nike worker in Vietnam what was the most important thing about working for Nike, her reply surprised him. It was not the handsome wages, but getting to work indoors and sending her children to school. For the average Mexican villager, of course, the road to indoor work leads across the border from Mexico in the United States.
For those already citified, the newly arriving immigrants are a problem. In 1850, the Irish crowding into New York and Boston utterly lacked city skills, and were regarded as sub-human, but by 1900 they were becoming policemen and teachers. In 1900, the immigrant Jews lacked intelligence, they said, but by the 1920s they were crowding WASPs aside in the Ivy League universities. In 1950, the blacks moved out of the South to crowd into the industrial cities of the North. Half a century later, they are moving strongly into the middle class. In the second half of the twentieth century, as millions of Mexicans arrived in the United States with few skills but a willingness to work, the old fears have returned.
What should the government do about the current wave of immigration? Should it ignore it? Should it declare an emergency, as Al Gore did for global warming in Earth in the Balance? Or should it try to muddle along as President Bush proposes, doing something, but not much, to bring order to the chaos of illegal immigration?
The best response is probably not much. Everyone wants an end to illegal immigration, but nobody turns away the illegal that wants a job. Conservatives rail about queue jumping; union members rail about low wage competition. But business wants a supply of cheap labor; Democrats scent a supply of immigrant votes, and practical Republican politicians want their share too. And who dares to dam the great tide of migration, one that is merely a local eddy of the global flood flowing from country to city.
Viewed from 30,000 feet, the Mexican immigration across the southern border is a sideshow in the global drama of transformation. Michael Barone in The New Americans has shown how it will end. The Mexican-Americans will assimilate. Conservatives will rail about an invasion; liberals will try to turn them into dutiful dependents in the liberal plantation. But businessmen will give them jobs, and the Mexican-Americans will find an honorable place in the American family.
More tantalizing is the future impact of the Indian and Chinese immigrants coming in at the top, educated and talented people who are already wielding influence as technology CEOs, university professors, and cultural content providers. Will they assimilate to the native American Brahmin caste of risk-avoiding liberals and help build neo-Europe? Will they become more American than heartland Americans? Or will they build a prototype global elite founded on a fusion of east and west that transcends the American vision?
And what of the big picture? What will China be like when the remaining 700 million peasants have migrated to the city? What about a billion Indians freed from the straitjacket of the License Raj? As Ronald Reagan said: you aint seen nothing yet.
Christopher Chantrill blogs at americanmanifestobook.blogspot.com.
Buy his Road to the Middle Class.
But I saw a man yesterday who knows a fellow who had it from a chappie
that said that Urquhart had been dipping himself a bit recklessly off the deep end.
Freddy Arbuthnot
Dorothy L. Sayers, Strong Poison
Tear down theory, poetic systems... No more rules, no more models... Genius conjures up
rather than learns... Victor Hugo
César Graña, Bohemian versus Bourgeois
We have met with families in which for weeks together, not an article of sustenance but potatoes had been used; yet for every child the hard-earned sum was provided to send them to school.
E. G. West, Education and the State
When we began first to preach these things, the people appeared as awakened from the sleep of agesthey seemed to see for the first time that they were responsible beings...
Finke, Stark, The Churching of America, 1776-1990
When we received Christ, Phil added, all of a sudden we now had a rule book to go by, and when we had problems the preacher was right there to give us the answers.
James M. Ault, Jr., Spirit and Flesh
A writer who says that there are no truths, or that all truth is merely relative, is asking you not to believe him. So dont.
Roger Scruton, Modern Philosophy
As far as the Catholic Church is concerned, the principal focus of her interventions in the public arena is the protection and promotion of the dignity of the person, and she is thereby consciously drawing particular attention to principles which are not negotiable...
[1.] protection of life in all its stages, from the first moment of conception until natural death; [2.] recognition and promotion of the natural structure of the family... [3.] the protection of the right of parents to educate their children.
Pope Benedict XVI, Speech to European Peoples Party, 2006
At first, we thought [the power of the West] was because you had more powerful guns than we had. Then we thought it was because you had the best political system. Next we focused on your economic system. But in the past twenty years, we have realized that the heart of your culture is your religion: Christianity.
David Aikman, Jesus in Beijing
But the only religions that have survived are those which support property and the family.
Thus the outlook for communism, which is both anti-property and anti-family, (and also anti-religion), is not promising.
F.A. Hayek, The Fatal Conceit
Conservatism is the philosophy of society. Its ethic is fraternity and its characteristic is authority the non-coercive social persuasion which operates in a family or a community. It says we should....
Danny Kruger, On Fraternity
Families helped each other putting up homes and barns. Together, they built churches, schools, and common civic buildings. They collaborated to build roads and bridges. They took pride in being free persons, independent, and self-reliant; but the texture of their lives was cooperative and fraternal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism
For [the left] there is only the state and the individual, nothing in between. No family to rely on, no friend to depend on, no community to call on. No neighbourhood to grow in, no faith to share in, no charities to work in. No-one but the Minister, nowhere but Whitehall, no such thing as society - just them, and their laws, and their rules, and their arrogance.
David Cameron, Conference Speech 2008