home  |  book  |

Democratic Capitalism Action

print view

Liberals, You're Doing Too Much!

by Christopher Chantrill
January 02, 2005 at 7:03 pm

|

AFTER spending Christmas Day in a liberal home I can report that this was not a Happy Holiday for liberals.  There was at least one thing to celebrate though: the courage of San Francisco mayor Gavin Newsom in standing up to the bigots and allowing people to do what comes naturally: fall in love and get married.

Otherwise things did not look too good to my liberal neighbors.  They saw hate everywhere they turned; one woman admitted to waking up most days and wanting to cry.  How could Americans elect a president like George W. Bush?  It just didn’t make sense.  After all liberals had done for America, from common schools to labor laws to health care to civil rights, how could they?

Exactly.  I couldn’t have said it better myself.  Liberals have “done” a lot for America, there’s no doubt of that.  Maybe, here and there, they’ve even done a bit too much for the nation.  Let’s take education, for starters.

Back in the 1830s, the United States had a rather ramshackle system of education: urban academies, “old field” rural schools, public schools, and charity schools.  But 90 percent of Americans were literate, so something was getting done.  Then along came enlightened Horace Mann with a plan to centralize and rationalize education using state funding and state superintendents.  He took a trip to Prussia to inspect its uniform compulsory government school system and saw that it was good.  A century and a half later studies show that 20 to 30 percent of American adults cannot read a bus schedule or fill in an employment application.  Yet for at least a century liberal government experts have had complete control of the nation’s education.  Just what exactly have liberals “done” for education?

A century ago both the United States and Britain had a vibrant social safety net funded and run by ordinary people.  The Manchester Union of Oddfellows, the Elks, the Moose, the Sons of Italy, and many more provided sick pay, death benefits, pre-paid health insurance, job referrals, and even orphanages and old-age homes to their members.  Then in Britain along came Lloyd George and marginalized the friendly societies with National Insurance; in the United States along came the New Deal and replaced neighborly mutual-aid with the rule of the experts.  Instead of ordinary people helping their neighbors, liberals substituted expert credentialed social workers and government programs.  Today, as economist Robert William Fogel has admitted in The Fourth Great Awakening, many social problems such as “drug addiction, alcoholism, births to unmarried teenage girls, rape, the battery of women and children, broken families, violent teenage death, and crime are generally more severe today than they were a century ago.”  What have all those programs and expert social workers “done” for America?

In the nineteenth century, ordinary Americans got to make the law themselves.  That’s what Peruvian Hernando De Soto found out researching his Mystery of Capital.  The landmark Homestead Act of 1862 was a codification of the living law that had been developed over decades by ordinary American farmers in defiance of the great and the good.  When the Forty-Niners arrived in California in the gold rush they found that the United States did not have any mining laws.  So they formed their own mineral districts, electing their own officers, and developed their own rules about mineral rights.  Twenty years later Congress finally got around to writing a federal mining law and codified, in large measure, the law developed by the rough hewn miners of 1849.  Today liberals don’t want ordinary Americans anywhere close to the law.

Curiously, there is one area of national life where liberals have not done too much: religion.  In the early nineteenth century, ordinary Americans built the Methodist Church; later on ordinary Americans built the Catholic Church.  In the twentieth century Americans built the Church of Latter Day Saints and thousands of Pentecostal and “fundamentalist” churches, and they still get to worship at churches that they build and govern themselves.  Needless to say, America’s churches are the wonder of the world, breathtaking in their diversity and vigor.

Of course, you will say, the United States has a vigorous education system, though woefully underfunded, a compassionate safety net despite the best efforts of Republicans, and a system of laws that has done wonders in eliminating age-old oppression and victimization.  I agree.  Nobody doubts that liberals have done many good things for America. 

But Americans wonder: At what cost?

Maybe that’s why the American people decided they wanted Republicans to run the federal government for the next few years.  They wanted liberals to do less for them.  You see, the United States was founded on the idea of self-government.  But when liberals insist on running everything with their liberal experts, that isn’t self-government; it’s something else.

Christopher Chantrill blogs at americanmanifestobook.blogspot.com.

Buy his Road to the Middle Class.

print view

To comment on this article at American Thinker click here.

To email the author, click here.

 

 TAGS


US Life in 1842

Families helped each other putting up homes and barns. Together, they built churches, schools, and common civic buildings. They collaborated to build roads and bridges. They took pride in being free persons, independent, and self-reliant; but the texture of their lives was cooperative and fraternal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism


Society and State

For [the left] there is only the state and the individual, nothing in between. No family to rely on, no friend to depend on, no community to call on. No neighbourhood to grow in, no faith to share in, no charities to work in. No-one but the Minister, nowhere but Whitehall, no such thing as society - just them, and their laws, and their rules, and their arrogance.
David Cameron, Conference Speech 2008


Socialism equals Animism

Imagining that all order is the result of design, socialists conclude that order must be improvable by better design of some superior mind.
F.A. Hayek, The Fatal Conceit


Sacrifice

[Every] sacrifice is an act of impurity that pays for a prior act of greater impurity... without its participants having to suffer the full consequences incurred by its predecessor. The punishment is commuted in a process that strangely combines and finesses the deep contradiction between justice and mercy.
Frederick Turner, Beauty: The Value of Values


Responsibility

Seeckt: "to make of each individual member of the army a soldier who, in character, capability, and knowledge, is self-reliant, self-confident, dedicated, and joyful in taking responsibility [verantwortungsfreudig] as a man and a soldier."
MacGregor Knox et. al., The dynamics of military revolution, 1300-2050


Religion, Property, and Family

But the only religions that have survived are those which support property and the family. Thus the outlook for communism, which is both anti-property and anti-family, (and also anti-religion), is not promising.
F.A. Hayek, The Fatal Conceit


Racial Discrimination

[T]he way “to achieve a system of determining admission to the public schools on a nonracial basis,” Brown II, 349 U. S., at 300—301, is to stop assigning students on a racial basis. The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.
Roberts, C.J., Parents Involved in Community Schools vs. Seattle School District


Postmodernism

A writer who says that there are no truths, or that all truth is ’merely relative’, is asking you not to believe him. So don’t.
Roger Scruton, Modern Philosophy


Physics, Religion, and Psychology

Paul Dirac: “When I was talking with Lemaître about [the expanding universe] and feeling stimulated by the grandeur of the picture that he has given us, I told him that I thought cosmology was the branch of science that lies closest to religion. However [Georges] Lemaître [Catholic priest, physicist, and inventor of the Big Bang Theory] did not agree with me. After thinking it over he suggested psychology as lying closest to religion.”
John Farrell, “The Creation Myth”


Pentecostalism

Within Pentecostalism the injurious hierarchies of the wider world are abrogated and replaced by a single hierarchy of faith, grace, and the empowerments of the spirit... where groups gather on rafts to take them through the turbulence of the great journey from extensive rural networks to the mega-city and the nuclear family...
David Martin, On Secularization


Never Trust Experts

No lesson seems to be so deeply inculcated by the experience of life as that you should never trust experts. If you believe doctors, nothing is wholesome: if you believe the theologians, nothing is innocent: if you believe the soldiers, nothing is safe. They all require their strong wine diluted by a very large admixture of insipid common sense.
Lord Salisbury, “Letter to Lord Lytton”


Mutual Aid

In 1911... at least nine million of the 12 million covered by national insurance were already members of voluntary sick pay schemes. A similar proportion were also eligible for medical care.
Green, Reinventing Civil Society


presented by Christopher Chantrill

 •  Contact