The Path To Real Change

The fact is that the American people aren’t listening. They just want change. They are worried about all the excitement that Republicans have brought them over the last seven years.

First there was 9/11. There was the bursting of the tech bubble and the bursting of the real-estate bubble. There was the doubling of gasoline prices. Then there is the Iraq war and its constant reminder that the world is a dangerous world.

All of this, remember, happened on President Bush’s watch.

So Americans want to “change” the watch. They just want some “change” from all this change. Republicans are turning to the Republican who did most to oppose President Bush. And they are turning to a Clinton for a reprise of the happy-go-lucky 1990s.

But despite the general agreement that the American people want change, nobody is offering it. Republicans do not have a candidate offering transformative change. Nor do the Democrats.

The Democrats are offering two solid liberals for President of the United States. The Republicans are offering candidates who, if even they present themselves as conservatives, are not exactly committed conservatives like the sainted Ronald Reagan. John McCain is conservative as far as his obstinate nature instinctively guides him and his lust for for the adulation of the beltway media permits him. The defeated Mitt Romney is a businessman and a manager. He’s a decent sort but he is not a transformative leader.

Senator McCain certainly cares about the war, and maybe about the judges. So maybe Republicans have the candidate that can stop the Democrats from losing the war on terror, like Jimmy Carter almost lost the Cold War. And he can prevent the appointment of four or five liberal justices to the United States Supreme Court.

This inordinate fear of Democratic government misses the point.

We cannot win the war on terror with partisan trench warfare. And we cannot win the culture war by stuffing the Supreme Court with conservative justices and hoping that over time we get to fill more vacancies than the liberals.

We need to create an America in which Democrats believe in the war on terror and believe that our western culture deserves to be not just defended but celebrated. We need to create an America where liberal justices on the Supreme Court have soured on the notion of the “living constitution” and only with great reluctance overturn the wisdom of the founders.

In other words, we need to win the larger war for hearts and minds. It is useless to drag the great questions of our times into vicious partisan mudbaths. All that does is cover the great questions with mud and make our liberal friends more determined than ever to defend their programs to the last minority woman.

We need to change liberal hearts and minds. We need to change their minds about life. We need to change their minds about the family. We need to change their minds about the economy. We need them to begin to question their faith in the benefits of compulsory government programs.

How, for instance, are we going to change the minds of the liberals about the war on terror?

The answer is bracing. We must give them a chance screw it up, like Jimmy Carter screwed up the Cold War with his 1977 claim that the US had got over its “inordinate fear of communism.” After President Carter had really screwed up the Cold War and really screwed up the economy, then the American people were ready for Ronald Reagan.

That is the conservative way. You treat Democrats like adults. You let them make mistakes and you hope they learn from them. When they don’t learn then you get to win landslide elections.

The liberal way is to treat people like children. You legislate law libraries full of laws to micromanage behavior. You force people to live healthy lives and keep them safe, and you give liberals lots of jobs administering the laws. But under the liberal way people never learn, because they never get to make mistakes.

The American people are right. It is time for a change. Then we’ll show ’em.

Christopher Chantrill blogs at americanmanifestobook.blogspot.com.

Buy his Road to the Middle Class.

print view

To comment on this article at American Thinker click here.

To email the author, click here.

TAGS

Chappies

“But I saw a man yesterday who knows a fellow who had it from a chappie that said that Urquhart had been dipping himself a bit recklessly off the deep end.” —Freddy Arbuthnot
Dorothy L. Sayers, Strong Poison

Hugo on Genius

“Tear down theory, poetic systems... No more rules, no more models... Genius conjures up rather than learns... ” —Victor Hugo
César Graña, Bohemian versus Bourgeois

Education

“We have met with families in which for weeks together, not an article of sustenance but potatoes had been used; yet for every child the hard-earned sum was provided to send them to school.”
E. G. West, Education and the State

Faith & Purpose

“When we began first to preach these things, the people appeared as awakened from the sleep of ages—they seemed to see for the first time that they were responsible beings...”
Finke, Stark, The Churching of America, 1776-1990

Conversion

“When we received Christ,” Phil added, “all of a sudden we now had a rule book to go by, and when we had problems the preacher was right there to give us the answers.”
James M. Ault, Jr., Spirit and Flesh

Postmodernism

A writer who says that there are no truths, or that all truth is ’merely relative’, is asking you not to believe him. So don’t.
Roger Scruton, Modern Philosophy

Faith and Politics

As far as the Catholic Church is concerned, the principal focus of her interventions in the public arena is the protection and promotion of the dignity of the person, and she is thereby consciously drawing particular attention to principles which are not negotiable... [1.] protection of life in all its stages, from the first moment of conception until natural death; [2.] recognition and promotion of the natural structure of the family... [3.] the protection of the right of parents to educate their children.
Pope Benedict XVI, Speech to European Peoples Party, 2006

China and Christianity

At first, we thought [the power of the West] was because you had more powerful guns than we had. Then we thought it was because you had the best political system. Next we focused on your economic system. But in the past twenty years, we have realized that the heart of your culture is your religion: Christianity.
David Aikman, Jesus in Beijing

Religion, Property, and Family

But the only religions that have survived are those which support property and the family. Thus the outlook for communism, which is both anti-property and anti-family, (and also anti-religion), is not promising.
F.A. Hayek, The Fatal Conceit

Conservatism

Conservatism is the philosophy of society. Its ethic is fraternity and its characteristic is authority — the non-coercive social persuasion which operates in a family or a community. It says ‘we should...’.
Danny Kruger, On Fraternity

US Life in 1842

Families helped each other putting up homes and barns. Together, they built churches, schools, and common civic buildings. They collaborated to build roads and bridges. They took pride in being free persons, independent, and self-reliant; but the texture of their lives was cooperative and fraternal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism

Society and State

For [the left] there is only the state and the individual, nothing in between. No family to rely on, no friend to depend on, no community to call on. No neighbourhood to grow in, no faith to share in, no charities to work in. No-one but the Minister, nowhere but Whitehall, no such thing as society - just them, and their laws, and their rules, and their arrogance.
David Cameron, Conference Speech 2008

Home

American Manifesto

Chapters

Chappies

roadtothemiddleclass

presented by Christopher Chantrill

Follow @chrischantrill • Contact