home  |  book  |

Manufacturing Failure Winning by Losing

print view

The Fight Against Sprawl

by Christopher Chantrill
February 26, 2007 at 11:37 am

|

EVERYONE KNOWS our American cities are blighted by “sprawl.” In the old days, cities were built with a certain regard for aesthetic qualities and the human scale—as anyone knows who has visited the cities of Europe.

In the United States our neighborhoods are cut in two by gigantic roaring freeways, and cities sprawl out with low-density development at the bidding of the automobile and the commercial strip developer. What is needed is some sort of rational control of sprawl to preserve the human scale and to prevent the bulldozing of open space and irreplaceable farmland into the maw of the insatiable developer.

With mass transit and with rational planning for “smart growth” driven by urban planners instead of developers we can begin to reverse the damage done to the urban landscape by a century of uncontrolled development driven by the demand of the almighty dollar.

That’s the conventional wisdom out there in liberal land. You can find it in Visalia, California, where the City Council is considering using “Ahwahnee principles” to control development.

Then there’s “Smart Growth 54923” in Berlin, Wisconsin, formed to fight the relocation of the local Wal-Mart. According to M.A. Binder: “Wal-Marts are a monopoly. They are about greed.”

These “smart growth” activists are actually the third wave of anti-sprawl reformers, according to Robert Bruegmann in Sprawl: A Compact History. Bruegmann is a professor of art history and urban planning at the University of Illinois in Champaign-Urbana. He finds the great and the good have always worried about urban sprawl, and they usually worry about it during an economic boom. But while they absolutely hate today’s sprawl, they often love yesterday’s sprawl and fight to preserve it.

Anyway, what exactly is sprawl? Does it mean the 10-acre exurban estates of people who can afford a real mansion landscaped tastefully into a grove of trees? Or does it mean McMansions built in large developments convenient to the stores and offices at a nearby regional mall? What about the hip people gentrifying a run down neighborhood? After gentrification, the population density in hip neighborhoods is invariably lower than when the neighborhood was a bustling working-class community. Does that count as sprawl?

Bruegmann twinkles that “Sprawl is subdivisions and strip malls intended for middle- and lower-middle-class families.”

But at least you can escape sprawl by moving to Europe. Sorry, advises Bruegmann. It’s already too late.

Take the quintessential European city: Paris. Did you know that the population density in the central arrondissements has been declining for a century? It reached 200,000 people per square mile in the mid-nineteenth century, but is now down to 75,000 per square mile. Of the total of 10 million people in the Paris region, the vast majority live in suburbs and exurbs—beyond the violent public-housing estates—in single-family homes and commute from suburb to suburb in their cars.

And that is not all. Did you know that Europeans don’t use buses and trains too much? Back in 1950 European bus, rail, and auto use each stood at about 200 billion passenger-kilometers per year. Today, bus and rail use is about the same as fifty years ago. But automobile use is up by an order of magnitude, at 3,500 billion passenger-kilometers per year, in good old mass-transit friendly Europe.

Fortunately, we are soon going to find out whether the ideas of the “smart growth” planners really work. Portland, Oregon decided to implement rational urban planning in the Portland area back in the 1960s, and has since defined an “urban growth boundary” to stop sprawl and built a region-wide light-rail system. The idea was to avoid Los Angeles style sprawl. Actually, population density in the Portland area is today about half the population density of the Los Angeles region, so increasing population density in the Portland area will likely make it more like Los Angeles.

The effort to increase population density in Portland should have interesting political effects. Says Bruegmann: “The only thing that citizens dislike more than sprawl at the edge is higher density near themselves.”

The odd thing is that notorious “sprawl” cities like Los Angeles, Las Vegas, and Phoenix don’t really sprawl. They have a fairly even population density across the entire metropolitan area. And at the end of the water main, the population density in the desert drops to zero. In the Northeast the high-density cities are surrounded by a vast halo of very low-density exurban dwellings often owned by successful professionals deeply committed to environmental values.

But never call it “sprawl.” Sprawl is other people living too large and living too close.

Christopher Chantrill blogs at americanmanifestobook.blogspot.com.

Buy his Road to the Middle Class.

print view

To comment on this article at American Thinker click here.

To email the author, click here.

 

 TAGS

Faith & Purpose

“When we began first to preach these things, the people appeared as awakened from the sleep of ages—they seemed to see for the first time that they were responsible beings...”
Finke, Stark, The Churching of America, 1776-1990

Mutual Aid

In 1911... at least nine million of the 12 million covered by national insurance were already members of voluntary sick pay schemes. A similar proportion were also eligible for medical care.
Green, Reinventing Civil Society

Education

“We have met with families in which for weeks together, not an article of sustenance but potatoes had been used; yet for every child the hard-earned sum was provided to send them to school.”
E. G. West, Education and the State

Living Under Law

Law being too tenuous to rely upon in [Ulster and the Scottish borderlands], people developed patterns of settling differences by personal fighting and family feuds.
Thomas Sowell, Conquests and Cultures

German Philosophy

The primary thing to keep in mind about German and Russian thought since 1800 is that it takes for granted that the Cartesian, Lockean or Humean scientific and philosophical conception of man and nature... has been shown by indisputable evidence to be inadequate. 
F.S.C. Northrop, The Meeting of East and West

Knowledge

Inquiry does not start unless there is a problem... It is the problem and its characteristics revealed by analysis which guides one first to the relevant facts and then, once the relevant facts are known, to the relevant hypotheses.
F.S.C. Northrop, The Logic of the Sciences and the Humanities

Chappies

“But I saw a man yesterday who knows a fellow who had it from a chappie that said that Urquhart had been dipping himself a bit recklessly off the deep end.”  —Freddy Arbuthnot
Dorothy L. Sayers, Strong Poison

Democratic Capitalism

I mean three systems in one: a predominantly market economy; a polity respectful of the rights of the individual to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; and a system of cultural institutions moved by ideals of liberty and justice for all. In short, three dynamic and converging systems functioning as one: a democratic polity, an economy based on markets and incentives, and a moral-cultural system which is plural and, in the largest sense, liberal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism

Action

The incentive that impels a man to act is always some uneasiness... But to make a man act [he must have] the expectation that purposeful behavior has the power to remove or at least to alleviate the felt uneasiness.
Ludwig von Mises, Human Action

Churches

[In the] higher Christian churches... they saunter through the liturgy like Mohawks along a string of scaffolding who have long since forgotten their danger. If God were to blast such a service to bits, the congregation would be, I believe, genuinely shocked. But in the low churches you expect it every minute.
Annie Dillard, Holy the Firm

Conversion

“When we received Christ,” Phil added, “all of a sudden we now had a rule book to go by, and when we had problems the preacher was right there to give us the answers.”
James M. Ault, Jr., Spirit and Flesh

Living Law

The recognition and integration of extralegal property rights [in the Homestead Act] was a key element in the United States becoming the most important market economy and producer of capital in the world.
Hernando de Soto, The Mystery of Capital

presented by Christopher Chantrill

 •  Contact