home  |  book  |

Don't Repeal the 22nd Amendment This Spring Do It for the Children

print view

Is Senator Schumer With Us or Against Us?

by Christopher Chantrill
March 12, 2006 at 4:12 pm

|

SO, THE DUBAI port deal is off. The firestorm is over. What began, according to Newsday, at “the moment Chuck Schumer fielded a call from an Associated Press reporter asking New York’s senior senator to comment on an obscure plan to rejigger operations at six U.S. ports” has ended with the global best practice port operation company deciding not to invest in operating America’s ports.

That could end up being a real lose-lose proposition for the United States.

But it makes complete sense that a Democrat like Schumer should have led the opposition to the port deal. As a graduate of New York City’s Democratic school of politics he seems only to understand its savage culture of ambush accusations, political shakedowns, and unashamed support for rent-seeking special interests.

For the rest of us the question is the security of our ports. Can we trust a state-owned Arab company like Dubai Ports World (DP World) to operate our port terminals? It is a question that goes directly to President Bush’s challenge immediately after 9/11. “Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists.”

That is what The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States had to decide: whether DP World should operate the six port terminals previously owned by foreign interest P&O Ports, based in the home of the British terrorists of 7/7.

That is what neoconservative godfather Norman Podhoretz was writing about in February 2002 Commentary when he called the war on terror: World War IV. Since at least 1848 the world has been split in two, between the camp that believes in a global commonwealth of contract and trust and the axis of evil that has revolted again and again against it. First it was Marx and Engels who led the revolt. Then it was the Fabians and the Progressives with their rational, factual socialism of compulsory schools and beneficial government programs. Then it was Adolf Hitler urging a return to blood and lebesraum. Then it was Stalin and Mao and their noble experiment in egalitarian nation-building. Now the spirited rich kids of Islam are leading the rebellion of World War IV.

So we ask the question: Is a firm like DP World with us or against us? Mr. President, Is It Safe?

Curiously, our American academicians have solved this problem. They have found why the global movement of contract and trust has won out again and again against the eternal gang of ruthless men. They have found this out by researching the Prisoner’s Dilemma. You know the setup. Two prisoners are confined in separate prison cells for questioning. The dilemma for each of them is: should he rat on the other prisoner or not? Should he cooperate with the other prisoner or defect and hope for a lenient sentence?

Back in 1984 Robert Axelrod from the University of Michigan announced a competition to devise an iterative strategy for winning the Prisoner’s Dilemma. Against all expectations the winner was a strategy called TIT FOR TAT. This strategy operated according to a simple rule. It started out by cooperating with the other prisoner, but thereafter always copied the other’s move. If he cooperated, TIT FOR TAT cooperated back. If the other prisoner defected, then TIT FOR TAT would defect right back. If you conduct this iterated strategy on the world, you will find that it creates islands of trust and cooperation that slowly grow and eventually take over the world.

You can beat TIT FOR TAT. In 2004 a team of students at Southampton University did it using a strategy of collusion between the prisoners, illuminating why we have laws against price fixing and insider trading.

TIT FOR TAT teaches that you should trust people who have demonstrated their trustworthiness.

Not surprisingly the huge international effort to improve the security of the cargo transportation system is working on the trust issue. It involves everyone from port operators to the U.S. government and the U.S. military-industrial complex. The core of the effort is to extend the borders of trust, to project its frontier way beyond the ports of the United States to the factories in China and East Asia where the goods for the world are produced and loaded into ocean containers. In this cooperative effort DP World, as a global best practice company in port security operations, is a trusted team member. For instance, according to Robert M. Green:

At the recently opened Pusan Newport in South Korea, DP World and tech partner Samsung of Japan worked with the Korean port authority to build a state-of-the-art security port.

Don’t expect a veteran New York City pol like Chuck Schumer to care about that. Opportunistic ambush, betrayal, and fleecing of honest businessmen—that’s what New York politics is all about, and always has been.

Christopher Chantrill blogs at americanmanifestobook.blogspot.com.

Buy his Road to the Middle Class.

print view

To comment on this article at American Thinker click here.

To email the author, click here.

 

 TAGS


US Life in 1842

Families helped each other putting up homes and barns. Together, they built churches, schools, and common civic buildings. They collaborated to build roads and bridges. They took pride in being free persons, independent, and self-reliant; but the texture of their lives was cooperative and fraternal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism


Society and State

For [the left] there is only the state and the individual, nothing in between. No family to rely on, no friend to depend on, no community to call on. No neighbourhood to grow in, no faith to share in, no charities to work in. No-one but the Minister, nowhere but Whitehall, no such thing as society - just them, and their laws, and their rules, and their arrogance.
David Cameron, Conference Speech 2008


Socialism equals Animism

Imagining that all order is the result of design, socialists conclude that order must be improvable by better design of some superior mind.
F.A. Hayek, The Fatal Conceit


Sacrifice

[Every] sacrifice is an act of impurity that pays for a prior act of greater impurity... without its participants having to suffer the full consequences incurred by its predecessor. The punishment is commuted in a process that strangely combines and finesses the deep contradiction between justice and mercy.
Frederick Turner, Beauty: The Value of Values


Responsibility

Seeckt: "to make of each individual member of the army a soldier who, in character, capability, and knowledge, is self-reliant, self-confident, dedicated, and joyful in taking responsibility [verantwortungsfreudig] as a man and a soldier."
MacGregor Knox et. al., The dynamics of military revolution, 1300-2050


Religion, Property, and Family

But the only religions that have survived are those which support property and the family. Thus the outlook for communism, which is both anti-property and anti-family, (and also anti-religion), is not promising.
F.A. Hayek, The Fatal Conceit


Racial Discrimination

[T]he way “to achieve a system of determining admission to the public schools on a nonracial basis,” Brown II, 349 U. S., at 300—301, is to stop assigning students on a racial basis. The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.
Roberts, C.J., Parents Involved in Community Schools vs. Seattle School District


Postmodernism

A writer who says that there are no truths, or that all truth is ’merely relative’, is asking you not to believe him. So don’t.
Roger Scruton, Modern Philosophy


Physics, Religion, and Psychology

Paul Dirac: “When I was talking with Lemaître about [the expanding universe] and feeling stimulated by the grandeur of the picture that he has given us, I told him that I thought cosmology was the branch of science that lies closest to religion. However [Georges] Lemaître [Catholic priest, physicist, and inventor of the Big Bang Theory] did not agree with me. After thinking it over he suggested psychology as lying closest to religion.”
John Farrell, “The Creation Myth”


Pentecostalism

Within Pentecostalism the injurious hierarchies of the wider world are abrogated and replaced by a single hierarchy of faith, grace, and the empowerments of the spirit... where groups gather on rafts to take them through the turbulence of the great journey from extensive rural networks to the mega-city and the nuclear family...
David Martin, On Secularization


Never Trust Experts

No lesson seems to be so deeply inculcated by the experience of life as that you should never trust experts. If you believe doctors, nothing is wholesome: if you believe the theologians, nothing is innocent: if you believe the soldiers, nothing is safe. They all require their strong wine diluted by a very large admixture of insipid common sense.
Lord Salisbury, “Letter to Lord Lytton”


Mutual Aid

In 1911... at least nine million of the 12 million covered by national insurance were already members of voluntary sick pay schemes. A similar proportion were also eligible for medical care.
Green, Reinventing Civil Society


presented by Christopher Chantrill

 •  Contact