Blair Wins Third Way Loses - Road to the Middle Class

ON MAY 5, Tony Blair led the British Labour Party to an unprecedented third consecutive electoral victory in Britain. You would think it would be time for celebration. But the cartoonists gave him a black eye, and the newly elected Labour Party members of Parliament are blaming him for the loss of 47 seats. With a majority of 66 in the House of Commons, they want him to resign.

With 356 seats in the new Parliament Tony Blair’s Labour Party is still, behind Blair’s fading smile, a coalition of the loony left and the clients of the welfare state. It’s getting a challenge in its northern strongholds from the Liberal Democrats. With 62 seats, the Lib Dems moved left in the May 5 election.

Then there is the Conservative Party, with 197 seats, the place for reactionaries that can’t persuade themselves to capitulate to the progressive world and its cult of perpetual adolescence. The general consensus is that the Conservatives have brought themselves back to respectability from the humiliations of 1997 and 2001 when Labour piled up huge majorities.

But the fact is that a majority of Britain’s electors voted for the parties of the left. The Guardian’s Timothy Garton Ash knows who they are: “liberal-minded voter[s]Ã¢â‚¬Â¦ who believe in fairness, tolerance, decency and combining social justice with individual freedom.” Never mind about violent crime, the disappearance of the working-class husband, and the emergence of a new non-working class “on the social,” (i.e. welfare). Let’s vote for “decency.”

Some people on the right are actually relieved that the Conservatives did not win. Minette Marrin in The Sunday Times and Peter Oborne in The Spectator think that the time for a Conservative government is not yet ripe. They expect a rendezvous with reality for Labour some time in the next parliament, for the Labour Party has been rapidly increasing taxes, from about 37 percent of GDP back in 1997 to 42 percent right now and climbing. They have increased the public payroll by over 800,000 employees, with no increase in private sector jobs. After the economic renaissance of the Thatcher years, they have turned the clock back to feudal clientage, extending Britain’s miasma of means-tested benefits so that 40 percent of Britons now get a substantial part of their income from the state.

But will the British people ever get fed up enough to turn again to the Tories? Middle America is firmly attached to the Republican Party, but Middle Britain isn’t so sure about the Conservatives. There was never an Equal Rights Amendment in Britain to make political activists out of women like Phyllis Schlafly, never a Supreme Court to provoke a pro-life movement into being with Roe v. Wade, never a ban on school prayer to create a Christian Right. There are conservative foundations in Britain: the free market Institute for Economic Affairs, and now Civitas that advocates for a turn from the welfare state to civil society. But there is no talk radio, no Christian Right, and no Fox News.

There is plenty for the Brits to get riled up about: spiraling crime rates that exceed levels in the United States, the utter demolition of working class culture and its authentic old institutions, functional illiteracy in about a third of young Britons, out-of-control immigration, and a complete collapse of marriage in the lower classes. But nobody seems upset enough to do anything about it, except perhaps in London where the Conservatives achieved some surprising gains. London is a city where high tax rates and high crime rates are felt most acutely.

Perhaps then the only hope is that, as former Chancellor of the Exchequer Kenneth Clarke has written: “in the end, Labour governments run out of money.” When this one does, perhaps the British people will be receptive to an alternative; they might come to see that they could get more services if the government monopolies in education and health were broken up and privatized. But so many pundits are confidently predicting this turn that they are probably wrong.

One thing we can see clearly. The so-called “Third Way” politics begins and ends with Bill Clinton and Tony Blair. No one can say that they didn’t try to lead their parties out of their left-wing ghettos. It took political brilliance of the first rank to take a McGovernized Democratic Party in 1992 and make it presentable to Middle America. It took equal brilliance to take Old Labour and get Middle Britain to fall in love with “New Labour” in 1997. But rank-and-file Democrats and Labourites hated it. They like their left-wing world, its utopian pieties and its rewarding government and non-profit sinecures. That is why the Labour Party is coming together this week to grease the skids for the best leader they ever had.

Christopher Chantrill blogs at americanmanifestobook.blogspot.com.

Buy his Road to the Middle Class.

print view

To comment on this article at American Thinker click here.

To email the author, click here.

TAGS

Chappies

“But I saw a man yesterday who knows a fellow who had it from a chappie that said that Urquhart had been dipping himself a bit recklessly off the deep end.” —Freddy Arbuthnot
Dorothy L. Sayers, Strong Poison

Hugo on Genius

“Tear down theory, poetic systems... No more rules, no more models... Genius conjures up rather than learns... ” —Victor Hugo
César Graña, Bohemian versus Bourgeois

Education

“We have met with families in which for weeks together, not an article of sustenance but potatoes had been used; yet for every child the hard-earned sum was provided to send them to school.”
E. G. West, Education and the State

Faith & Purpose

“When we began first to preach these things, the people appeared as awakened from the sleep of ages—they seemed to see for the first time that they were responsible beings...”
Finke, Stark, The Churching of America, 1776-1990

Conversion

“When we received Christ,” Phil added, “all of a sudden we now had a rule book to go by, and when we had problems the preacher was right there to give us the answers.”
James M. Ault, Jr., Spirit and Flesh

Postmodernism

A writer who says that there are no truths, or that all truth is ’merely relative’, is asking you not to believe him. So don’t.
Roger Scruton, Modern Philosophy

Faith and Politics

As far as the Catholic Church is concerned, the principal focus of her interventions in the public arena is the protection and promotion of the dignity of the person, and she is thereby consciously drawing particular attention to principles which are not negotiable... [1.] protection of life in all its stages, from the first moment of conception until natural death; [2.] recognition and promotion of the natural structure of the family... [3.] the protection of the right of parents to educate their children.
Pope Benedict XVI, Speech to European Peoples Party, 2006

China and Christianity

At first, we thought [the power of the West] was because you had more powerful guns than we had. Then we thought it was because you had the best political system. Next we focused on your economic system. But in the past twenty years, we have realized that the heart of your culture is your religion: Christianity.
David Aikman, Jesus in Beijing

Religion, Property, and Family

But the only religions that have survived are those which support property and the family. Thus the outlook for communism, which is both anti-property and anti-family, (and also anti-religion), is not promising.
F.A. Hayek, The Fatal Conceit

Conservatism

Conservatism is the philosophy of society. Its ethic is fraternity and its characteristic is authority — the non-coercive social persuasion which operates in a family or a community. It says ‘we should...’.
Danny Kruger, On Fraternity

US Life in 1842

Families helped each other putting up homes and barns. Together, they built churches, schools, and common civic buildings. They collaborated to build roads and bridges. They took pride in being free persons, independent, and self-reliant; but the texture of their lives was cooperative and fraternal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism

Society and State

For [the left] there is only the state and the individual, nothing in between. No family to rely on, no friend to depend on, no community to call on. No neighbourhood to grow in, no faith to share in, no charities to work in. No-one but the Minister, nowhere but Whitehall, no such thing as society - just them, and their laws, and their rules, and their arrogance.
David Cameron, Conference Speech 2008

Home

American Manifesto

Chapters

Chappies

roadtothemiddleclass

presented by Christopher Chantrill

Follow @chrischantrill • Contact